🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue worked, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is treading a complex path since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks reopen.

Trump recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He said the attacks began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently attempted to enforce their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the primary answer to settle conflicts, but its criteria, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the wake of this invasion."