🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". A law may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to enact a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," said a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other states are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments globally are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.